Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bowling Alleys and Tornadoes: G&K Hunting Grounds -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (106)	1/9/2000 7:27:00 PM
From: Eric L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 153

UF, << Hey, Eric, I found an old post of yours on this abandoned thread, and it was a doozie. You introduced phcm, which was trading at 41 at the time. It's returned 214% in the ensuing 6 months! Let's see you do that again <gg>. >> Yes ... and a month earlier I introduced it on the big guys thread and you kicked me over into this darned limbo ... <g> - Eric - PS: I never took a position in phcm. G&K investing for me, but there are some good potential candidates that should be discussed here. I hope the regulars bookmark this thread.

To: Uncle Frank who wrote (106)	1/10/2000 7:38:00 AM
From: gdichaz	Respond to of 153

Uncle Frank: As a searcher for potential, think that the place to search initially is pre chasm - or bowling alley or tornado at the latest. And in my case, since my attention span is limited, that means taking a small position in order to watch with some care. That is why I own such stocks as ARMHY, PHCM, PSIOF, etc. In addition I have recently added GMST and CREE. And of course, I have long held GSTRF and LOR. This is my own watch and wait portfolio. Or course as you know, I am comfortable with these, since I have studied the technologies they are in. Therefore I know how they "fit". (Note: except for GMST and CREE where my knowledge is shallow - but have followed the G&K discussions as carefully as I could) Do not suggest such an approach on a scattershot basis. Let's see if you have succeeded in breathing new life into this thread. Best. Cha2