Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (86478)	1/11/2000 12:46:00 AM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572364

Paul, You claimed that I said Intel's estimates were 130 W at 600 MHz? Where did I say this? I am asking this question in simple English, show me where I said 130 watts at 600 MHz! In one post I asked you this with regard to current status of Merced, not initial estimates. "How many Watts does Merced burns at 600 MHz? 150W ????" Do you see the question marks, that means I am asking a question. Do you also see that question is asked in present form (does, not did)? I know you already know what I have said consistantly over and over! Initial estimates, before the chip was running, where 130 Watts at 700 MHz. That has proven to be too low. I do not know the CURRENT status, that is why I asked. This is the 4th time I am saying this. Do you understand this Paul? You said I was deceptive and also said initial estimates were 130 W at 600 MHz. I NEVER SAID THIS Show me where I said this. Show me, show me, show me! Paul, you continued arrogance in this very simple matter is indeed embarrassing. You are unwilling to admit to a mistake you have clearly made. What bugs me is that you made a mistake and accused me of being "deceptive" based on your mistake. And now you are unwilling to admit to your mistake and apologize. This is a truly a sorry and sad display of your character. There is no other way of putting it. Mani

To: Paul Engel who wrote (86478)	1/11/2000 2:10:00 AM
From: Petz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572364

Paul, please apologize to Mani. He did NOT state that the Merced burns 150W at 600 MHz. He asked you if it did. Big difference. Petz