Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (87370)	1/15/2000 4:22:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573922

ted - <It seems to me you need to be worrying more about getting Intel's yields up so that Intel can satisfy its customers and meet their product needs. JMHO> Although until yields are 100%, there is always a yield issue, what Intel needs to do is bring capacity online, which it is doing. PB

To: tejek who wrote (87370)	1/15/2000 5:36:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573922

Ted, <What I heard Sanders say in the CC is that the absolute earliest any shipments could start was Q2 but that volume shipment would begin in the 2nd H, 2000.> I originally expected volume shipments to begin in Q2 2000. Either I misinterpreted what Sanders said, or AMD slipped and Sanders is pulling a fast one on us. Either way, it seems volumes from Dresden are coming later than I thought. <It seems to me you need to be worrying more about getting Intel's yields up so that Intel can satisfy its customers and meet their product needs.> Yields? What's that? 8^o (I'm not a process guy, if you haven't noticed.) By the way, the first project I worked on hasn't even been released yet. And even when it is released, I can assure you that yields will be one of the lesser concerns. Tenchusatsu