Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (62394)	1/15/2000 8:30:00 AM
From: Poet	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 152472

Maurice, Since you chose to respond publicly to my post last night about the recent events on this thread, I'll respond to you, Maurice. You've got a problem with Jim Willie? Please take it up with him or SI. I'll tell you again that your overreaction to the phrase "make an impression" on Mr. Molloy ( something about how this was an intent to murder) was sadly laughable. Would you like to know what I find offensive? Your smug and sexist off-topic rants on this thread are far more offensive to me than a one-liner about "wearing to the left". Please go back to the other QCOM thread and allow us to work out our problems here.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (62394)	1/15/2000 9:05:00 AM
From: Jill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Wading through another 500 posts of nearly all junk. Why? You have a thread where you're happy. So why voluntarily slog through one you don't like?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (62394)	1/15/2000 11:04:00 AM
From: Ramsey Su	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 152472

Message 12581218 Maurice, I have told you for years that "Your smug and sexist off-topic rants" will get you into trouble. You are an old goat who has no concept of new age investing. You wasted years debating CDMA and QCOM against Bill F, Daniel B, Tero K ...... what a total waste. Let me ask you a question. Have you ever been able to predict the future stock price of QCOM just once, not to mention every minute of the trading day? You call the great ones rude names and yet, it is them who can accurately tell us whether to buy sell or hold QC 24 hours a day, down to each 1/16 move. Can you? I second the motion: Please go back to the other QCOM thread and allow us to work out our problems here. Afterall, don't you know this is someone else's home now? I know it has the same address as your old home but you have been evicted long ago. So either contribute by telling us what QC will open at on Tuesday or go away. Well, that is not fair because that may be too demanding. How about starting you off easy. Your assignment for Tuesday: post a quote on the thread, every hour on the hour, just in case our own quote servers are not quite up to speed. Ramsey

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (62394)	1/15/2000 11:17:00 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 152472

"aggression, vulgarity, obnoxiousness and mysticism" thanks, Maurice it is good to see you post again you must have brought to an end another bout of heavy drinking if you can manage to engage in some rational thought, you might notice that when I spark a hostile thought and message, it is usually toward a person who has initiated a shallow and mindless needless attack... perhaps even an attack primed from some sad insecurity you have been singularly unimpressive on these threads with your contributions... you once displayed the extreme naivete, ignorance, all while fully arrogant in telling me that stocks do not display any evidence displaying the laws of momentum... you cited evidence that money moves at the speed of light, missing even the concept of price movement (not money movement) you bore the hell out of me, Maurice I honestly believe if you, Molloy, and Ramsey were to disappear off the face of the earth, no obnoxious, aggressive behavior would be manifested on my part I dont suffer arrogant fools well you three are arrogant fools to others: I have not gone away permanently I have just gone away until anything of value piques me the emotional churning has gotten to me also the stupid insults from destructive influences such as Molloy are not worth my time right now we are in a waiting period until QCOM enters the limelight, when clarity yields to ambiguity, when rotations come and go only to return to real leaders like our stock, when our earnings are reported it would give me great satisfaction to knock any of you Three Unwise Men to the ground but as long as you make it so basically simple to knock you to the ground argumentatively, I will find contentment in that alternative outlet man oh man, you guys aint that bright or gifted or deep your rants are a transparent distraction for lack of depth / Jim Willie

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (62394)	1/15/2000 4:27:00 PM
From: waverider	Respond to of 152472

Nice to see you here Mq. A relief for sore eyes. Gud Day!

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (62394)	1/16/2000 12:06:00 AM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 152472

Even I can't take it. Buy the way you have to lump molly in with it all. A lot bickering from what are suppose to be Adults. Now on topic, QCOM is going to be in vacuum, Like I have stated a couple of times, the article from Ruf. confirm this, the stock is going to to be mired in last year outside gains, unless earnings can sustain the gains, . I have question for the holders of QCOM that have held for longer then one year or anyone else of course, mainly would like to hear from the holders that have firm grip on the sector from watching for a long time. Do you feel, based on what you are currently seeing in the in the wireless sector, that QCOM can live on earnings along for the remainder of this year? I'm not asking if you will sell. I just wondering about the justification of the price at the current level based on the current climate in the wireless sector. Thanks, Greg