Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (62419)	1/15/2000 11:55:00 AM
From: Ruffian	Respond to of 152472

<I honestly believe if you, Molloy, and Ramsey were to disappear off the face of the earth, no obnoxious, aggressive behavior would be manifested on my part> Based on your personal experience with the above names, i see your motivation. I for one find these people very technically savy and informed.It has always been Qualcomm 1st, for me, and returns later. This has changed, i have found myself changing for the worse, too. Hard to break those short term "me first habits", but i am working on it.Was much more excited about getting over here, in the past. Hope that feeling returns soon. Ruff

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (62419)	1/15/2000 2:20:00 PM
From: gc	Respond to of 152472

JM, take it to PM if you feel compelled to write something like this. TIA

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (62419)	1/15/2000 2:30:00 PM
From: carranza	Respond to of 152472

I hope you don't stop posting. While TA is not in my analytical arsenal, and I don't know how valid it is, I have enjoyed your predictions. The board should be diverse and encompass all viewpoints, hopefully without ill will on the part of anyone.

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (62419)	1/16/2000 5:54:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 152472

Serious TA Post* Jim, there's no point debating mysticism with mystics, but to run it by you again, [in the hope of saving some of your Moonies from losing too much money] momentum in stock prices is a fantasy. It's not like momentum in a runaway train, though it's always fun to use such an analogy in the markets and people often do. Momentum in physics is real. Momentum in the mind is not. Stock price 'momentum' is not tangible. Minds change in an instant. That's why 'the stock is rising today, therefore it will rise tomorrow' or the reverse, will NOT make you money. You can easily test the theory by buying at the open every day the market rose the day before and selling at the open every day the market went down the day before. Why don't you test your own belief and let us know if you are still working next Xmas or whether you really will quit your job in February? DON'T try that theory at home folks. You'll lose your money to the brokers who will take a cut every time. Mqurice PS: Your continued absurd personal attacks accusing me of being a drunk are going to cost you a LOT of money. You might not understand that such an untruth is defamatory. You should forthwith phone your lawyer. You said <I dont suffer arrogant fools well>. Well, no wonder you get all weird with people. You ought to look in a mirror. Please advise whether you wish to settle out of court and save yourself some legal costs.