Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: engineer who wrote (62893)	1/18/2000 2:21:00 PM
From: Murrey Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

engine(and the rest of the language police)...I think you'd be hard put to litigate successfully on the basis of your somewhat pious posts. No, I wouldn't think kindly of the language, but I sure as HELL wouldn't let it PEE on my parade like a lot of folks. Get my drift?

To: engineer who wrote (62893)	1/18/2000 2:30:00 PM
From: myadd	Respond to of 152472

Enough already...we have bigger fish to fry!EOM

To: engineer who wrote (62893)	1/18/2000 2:44:00 PM
From: Ed Forrest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

<<I suggest that in this country, the EEOC will allow you to sue them and recover quite alot of money.>> Engineer Having had first hand dealings with the EEOC I know that they are anything but user friendly.By the time you wade through the endless maze of paperwork,the indifference of government employees,the never ending time consuming process of trying to prove your allegations and on and on most people just throw up their hands and say forget it. Cheers Ed PS The apostrophe police nailed me last night so you can probably expect a visit from the spelling cops today.Hope you escape.:)