Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (96773)	1/19/2000 6:03:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Look Steve, you got your congrats over on the AMD thread from the Intel longs, so why do you have to come over here with your taunts. One thing worse than a sore loser is a bad winner.

To: steve harris who wrote (96773)	1/19/2000 6:44:00 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

Stevie Wonder, As PB said, you got our congratulations on the AMD thread. I believe a strong AMD is good for the industry and ultimately good for Intel. So tell me something, was AMD capacity constrained? We know that Intel could have sold many more chips. How many of AMD's sales were second choices, because the OEM's and end users couldn't get Intel? A rising tide lifts all boats. AMD has demonstrated that they can turn a rare profit when Intel can't meet demand and the demand is unprecedented. Intel has demonstrated that it can make huge profits when AMD is bleeding money. You can deceive yourself that this is a seachange, I expect history will repeat itself. When I go to the AMD thread, I am polite and encouraging. You come here and you are rude and disparage a company that we respect. You seem to be more against Intel than you are for AMD. What does that say about you? I have a lot more respect for AMD than I do for some of it's investors. John