Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (97133)	1/22/2000 10:56:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony - STM indicates fairly sever capaciy crunch, analysts expect the trend to continue across the sector. Note the Flash memory situation. PB eet.com Capacity crunch leads STMicro to broad allocation By Peter Clarke EE Times (01/20/00, 6:31 p.m. EST) PARIS — STMicroelectronics reported improved results for the 1999 calendar year on Thursday (Jan. 20), but said it has begun allocating orders within all of its product families. Under allocation, STMicro customers could be rationed and may not be able to buy extra chips to respond to increased demand for their products. Allocation is suddenly so widespread at STMicro that analysts see it is a sign that a capacity crunch is about to hit the semiconductor market, earlier and more widespread than previously predicted. While announcing the company's annual results here, Pasquale Pistorio, STMicro's veteran president and chief executive officer, said the current situation is "the most explosive demand I've ever seen in my career." The company's flash memory supplies are seriously constrained. Despite plans to bring on additional capacity at several fabrication facilities, company executives said that ST's flash memory production is sold out for the whole of 2000. When asked if any of ST's products were on allocation, Pistorio responded, "The question should be 'Do you have any product families not on allocation?' And the answer would be 'No.' "We try to allocate [production capacity] first to our strategic partners and then to our top 30 customers," he said. For the year ended Dec. 31, STMicro reported annual revenues of $5.06 billion, up 19 percent from the previous year, and net income of $547.3 million, up 33.1 percent from 1998. The financial results showed that ST's situation improved quarter by quarter through 1999, ending in a booming fourth quarter in which revenues were up 30.5 percent to $1.48 billion, compared with the year-earlier fourth quarter, and net income was up 51.3 percent to $184.3 million over the same period. Pistorio said that he believed ST was in a better position than many of its competitors because it had laid plans in 1999 for new fabs and to expand production at a number of existing fabs. New 8-inch fabs in Rousset, France and Agrate, Italy, and a 6-inch fab in Singapore, are all due to begin volume production in 2000. But Pistorio admitted that limitations in the supply of production equipment had forced ST to miss a target for capital expenditure in 1999. "We said we would spend $1.6 billion, but we missed. We spent $1.348 billion but we have a lot of equipment arriving at factories now," he said. Capital expenditure at ST is likely to increase again in 2000, but much of the new capacity will only begin to come on-stream in the second half of this year. Citing preliminary results released earlier this year by Dataquest Inc., which showed worldwide semiconductor revenues growing 17.8 percent in 1999, Pistorio said, "The market without DRAM grew 16 percent last year and we grew 19 percent. We believe ST is positioned to grow more than the market in 2000."

To: Tony Viola who wrote (97133)	1/22/2000 11:54:00 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

OT OT OT RE: "there are ALWAYS companies, from here to Japan, coming out with "Cisco killer" routers that get just minute attention" Hi Tony, ...and they keep cropping up too...just got a call at home today (how'd they get my home #?) from a headhunter (are headhunter calls on a Saturday a new thing?) wanting me to interview for a vp mktg position at a router co. (I declined to pursue). About your comment on Cisco. Wasn't you-know-which-company (whose name I won't mention and whose products were reported to be well-engineered) suppose to be the Cisco killer back in '96 (or so). It takes more than a well-engineered product to beat Cisco (the whole company, not just on one product). Thanks for your post on IBM's servers. About your comment on "rocket ship" ... the thread was sort of like earnings day, today. Would someone please turn on the lights? : ) Cheers, Amy J