Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: milo_morai who wrote (88942)	1/22/2000 1:11:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572354

Re: "My point is still the same. INTC will not be using copper for a year, therefore AMD has 12months more experience using COPPER, it doesn't matter to me if it's 180nM or 130nM." Milo have you noticed that AMD has certainly spent a very long time supposedly "perfecting" their copper process. It doesn't look to me as though it is very perfect, seeing as it's still missing. EP

To: milo_morai who wrote (88942)	1/22/2000 5:10:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572354

Milo - <My point is still the same. INTC will not be using copper for a year, therefore AMD has 12months more experience using COPPER, it doesn't matter to me if it's 180nM or 130nM.> milo, I think you miss my point, or choose to ignore it. Whatever. For a whole host of reasons, I believe the response to this simplistic argument, is something along the lines of BFD. If you think this is a huge advantage for AMD, fine. I reiterate, Intel has been working with Cu for a few years now. PB