Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: milo_morai who wrote (89004)	1/22/2000 6:19:00 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572631

Milo, if the HP/iNtEL deal on Merced/McKinley falls apart like the DEC/iNtEL deal done, wouldn't that be something? I would think HP picking up Athlons might affect iNtEL's attitude, would it not? AMD getting Dirk Meyer and assembling the K7 team, that is worth a lot, now and in the future. steve

To: milo_morai who wrote (89004)	1/22/2000 6:31:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572631

Re: "If you are so sure of your info Elmer at what point did you intend to Short AMD?" I didn't intend to short AMD. It's just not my investment style and I don't see it as a smart move at this point anyway. Re: "Can you provide any Links from INTC backing up this statement of yours please"Intel stated all along they had no need to go to copper before the .13u process"... I for one would like to read the PR." Sure, be glad to. eet.com "Intel sticks with aluminum at 0.18 microns" "At some time in the future-perhaps at 0.13 micron, certainly at 0.1 micron-we will switch to copper," "Copper is a more expensive technology, and the benefits at 0.18-micron line widths are not compelling, Bohr said. " EP