SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Invest / LTD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Ox who wrote (11633)1/24/2000 9:26:00 PM
From: SJS  Respond to of 14427
 
Mike,

AMCC and PMCS are both Cinderella. VTSS is one of the other stepsisters.

I don't make the rules, but the charts and the trading on these stocks are telling me something.

I can't make any headway with my VTSS investment for my son. It's (after today's drop) just about right back where I bought it on 12/9/99. YTD VTSS is DOWN 7.5%

In the meantime, the AMCC I bought for my wife on 1/5/00 at 113, is now 30% higher.

Compelling numbers. I am going to follow what they're telling me and their lead for now.

Steve



To: The Ox who wrote (11633)1/24/2000 9:41:00 PM
From: Thean  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 14427
 
Mike, it makes perfect sense to me that AMCC is valued 2.5 times more than VTSS. The basis is float.

VTSS's float is 131.9 MM.
AMCC's float is 46.6 MM.

The ratio is 2.8, very close to your 2.5 estimate.

This is the single best attribute in making profit prediction in hot stocks like the IPO's. Why do two IPO's of equal substance perform so differently on the IPO? The answer is in the float. The number of willing buyers out there is the same. The supply of stock makes the difference.

VTSS and AMCC are in the same space and thus should be attractive to investors the same way from their business offerings. Let's assume those who know VTSS also know AMCC and vice versa. Let's also say half wants to buy VTSS and half wants to buy AMCC. They go out to the market to buy VTSS and AMCC. The theoretical result is AMCC goes up 2.8 times more than VTSS after some time.

Therefore, what is surprising to me is that the original investors (presumably the big institutions who want to hold LT) have not sold any AMCC and switch into VTSS simply based on the relative disparity in valuation.

However, if the market gets a big scare and shake out all sorts of investors, then the distribution of buyers over the two stocks on the rebound may be adjusted to overweigh VTSS. On the other hand, if this market keeps rocketing higher, the disparity in ratio is going to stay the same since no net sellers are willing to unload AMCC or VTSS.



To: The Ox who wrote (11633)1/25/2000 7:19:00 PM
From: SJS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14427
 
Mike,

This little nugget is being credited with the turnaround today. Go semi equipment mfgs.....yeah!
____________

15:49 ET Intel Corp (INTC) 101 1/8 +2 5/16 (+2%) Traders attributing sudden rebound in tech stocks to report that Intel spending $2 bln to build a high-volume wafer plant in Arizona. Seeing positive reaction in chip equipment group, with many of the leading names trading near their highs of the day.... Nasdaq +57, SOX +20.