SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scot who wrote (89827)1/26/2000 9:00:00 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572361
 
Re: Come on Process Boy...

Don't be so hard on him. He considerately reported what he personally was seeing at his one FAB.

This was a mistake from the very top. In the current (and, sadly, the last) issue of Performance Computing, Tom Yager's column Integration is titled Embracing Change. Here is an excerpt about the situation in 1999: (I could not find the column at their web site)

...AMD got chips into some low-end laptops and Best Buy PCs, but that's it. With compatibility issues (mostly motherboard and not CPU related) and abysmal floating-point performance, the K6 CPUs never made it onto the corporate "buy" list. Intel kept lowering its Celeron prices until AMD couldn't turn a profit on K6. The field was clear. PC used to mean IBM. Now PC means Intel, so Intel wrote AMD off.
Hello? Mistake? Intel should fire its radar operator. Late in 1999, AMD came out of nowhere with the K7 processor, the Athlon, which has Intel doing the headless chicken.


PB and others like him did their jobs well, and produced as many or more high speed coppermines as were forecasted to be needed. How were they to know that the vaunted Intel "paranoid" top management was too busy prancing around the "dot com for sale" mall to be bothered with the boring old CPU business.

So, right now, AMD is putting the final shine on the logo of its new Dresden FAB, that will be ramping up just as demand can justify it, and Intel is digging a hole in the ground for the new FAB that it desperately needed last quarter.

Dan



To: Scot who wrote (89827)1/26/2000 9:24:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572361
 
Scot - <Unbelieveable! Since PB is nowhere to be found>

Here I am.

I still stand by what I've said. Intel is supply constrained.

I've indicated capacity constraints over and over.

That's the story, as much as probably some of you on this thread would like to have it be something else.

Nothing has changed.

PB