To: Greg S. who wrote (850 ) 1/27/2000 1:39:00 AM From: Sun Tzu Respond to of 10713
As you pointed out, the interdependencies of the win or loss are hard to calculate. So let's focus just on card distribution. Assuming a random distribution of cards, you would expect that in a large enough sample, one third of the cards are high and another third are low cards (and a third in between), as evidenced by playing the whole set. On the other hand, as the subset shrinks, predicting the percentage of the cards that will be in each group becomes impossible (how can I know what the next card will be right off the bat?) [Random Walkers pay attention] . BUT as high cards pile up, the sample size increases. Which in turn increases the odds that the next card will not be a high card. This is another way of saying that card counting works. If I know all the aces are gone, I don't have to worry about a dealer's blackjack. In my case, rather than aiming for the old fashioned count every card and calculate the odds for the whole deck (which does not work in modern games), I aim to see the odds that say 15% of the deck is extremely out of balance. Let's see how this applies to investing. While it is very hard to predict the day to day movement of a stock. Every so often it becomes easy to predict the movement of the market as a whole, and in turn the stock in question. Here is a piece from the starting article of this thread which talked about why the market went through a sever correction.The percentage of stocks that are 2 standard deviations above their 200 day moving average should be ~4% (almost by definition). The market can withstand the overbought situation until this number reaches ~18%. Prior to October '87 this number was ~27%, in the mini-crash of '90 it was ~22% and in the April of '98 it hit the all time high of 35%. Read your stat books and try to calculate how unlikely it is for 35% of your samples to be 2 standard deviations apart from the mean. In other words I was arguing that reversion to the mean was forcing the market to drop fast and hard (or otherwise thread water for a long long time), to please the gods of probability. The economic issues of the time were just an excuse for this process to happen. So you see playing blackjack and the market have much in common. cheers, ST