SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (4700)1/27/2000 8:16:00 PM
From: re3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42523
 
i'm buying more at the opening dingle tomorrow.

i was curious about your position on the oils/base metals vs luc. if you see sunny days ahead , i mean a b.k. <g>, what characteristics to the b.k. do you see that would keep the commodities up vs luc who feels only gold and pall. and such will go up or maintain value ?

i called four newspapers about luc buying barrick calls !!!
<g>



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (4700)1/27/2000 8:17:00 PM
From: re3  Respond to of 42523
 
quote.yahoo.com



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (4700)1/27/2000 11:14:00 PM
From: fut_trade  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42523
 
Standard & Poors 2001 eps estimates for the SPX have just dropped a bit to their losest value since early Oct.

01/19/00 67.05
01/26/00 64.02

My gut feeling, though, is that they could quite easily pop back up to 67 or so next week. I'm not sure if this recent drop is even significant, and I am not sure it's even worth tracking these numbers. I suppose a drop of the eps below 60 would suggest some potential problem though, but I think the stock market would already have reacted before the new estimates have come out.



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (4700)1/28/2000 6:22:00 AM
From: re3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42523
 
quoteline.com