Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James E Lynch who wrote (42660)	1/28/2000 9:18:00 AM
From: jhild	Respond to of 43774

That's interesting that they will pay UPI for wire feed, I guess, but they need to be making money and filing financials rather than signing up to pay someone for content to put on their embryonic concept site.

To: James E Lynch who wrote (42660)	1/28/2000 9:56:00 AM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Strange they are buying NATIONAL wire feed when they are trying to be a LOCAL AREA internet service. This doesn't move their alleged local orientation along at all. I am not sure they have a firm vision of where they are going if they are ballyhooing something like this. Suppose they are desperate to release just about anything they can? From UPI's website comes a description of the service they buying: UPI WebLine WebLine is a streamlined, high-value, basic news service ideal for Internet clients, the fastest-growing segment of the market. WebLine delivers what clients need, and only what they need: brief, real-time, breaking news stories from around the world, including sports and entertainment, but without volumes of extra material to plow through. WebLine gives you what you want, when you want it, in a form you can easily use. Not exactly a world beater when it comes to exciting content. And it is strangely outside the business description of OurEVillage.com which is supposed to have a local orientation. If this is so important I am wondering where the PR from UPI is about this deal?

To: James E Lynch who wrote (42660)	1/28/2000 9:17:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

Here's an interesting article about how profitable doing nothing can be. It talks about a company that is right up front about it too.: Published Thursday, January 27, 2000, in the Miami Herald Making it big by doing nothing An interesting aspect of the Internet boom is the way it has transformed the idea of the company. A company used to be a group of people who organized themselves for fairly well-defined tasks. The stock market now indulges a looser definition. A company is now a group of people who raise capital to do whatever they want to do. The biggest and most respectable new companies, such as Amazon.com, routinely surprise investors with some new activity they intend to spend money learning how to do. If you asked an investor in any of several hundred Internet companies what, exactly, his company would be doing or claim to be doing six months from today, he would say, if he were feeling honest, ''I have no idea.'' Once an Internet company is considered established, or committed to a line of attack, it loses its allure. It leaves itself open to the sort of hard analysis Internet companies strive to avoid. To be desirable, an Internet company must be ever so slightly unknowable. It must remain forever in a state of pure possibility. A Bloomberg user recently pointed out what must be one of the purest examples of pure possibility, an Internet company called NetJ.com Corp. NetJ.com is smaller than most of its Internet cousins. It has a market capitalization of a mere $22.9 million. Still, its stock price has soared -- up seven-fold to $3.50 -- since the middle of last year. Six months ago it offered a five-for-one stock split. The only hint that NetJ.com is in any way different from the general run of Internet companies is Bloomberg's description of it: NetJ.com has no business operations. This raises an obvious question: How can a business worth $22 million have no business operations? Assuming that the Bloomberg machine must be mistaken, I went to the documents filed by NetJ.com with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There I found the following confession: ''The company is not currently engaged in any substantial business activity and has no plans to engage in any such activity in the foreseeable future.'' Translated into English: We do nothing and we intend to continue to do nothing. NetJ.com began life as NetBanx.com, which hoped to collect bad debts for doctors. That didn't work out. So the company gave up, and went into another line of work: searching to acquire or merge with another company that actually does something. For this it claims to be well-suited: ''Management generally, and Mr. Stifford [the founder] in particular, has substantial experience and expertise with analyzing prospective business endeavors.'' You might wonder why a company that actually does something would care to merge with one that does nothing, even if it has a gift for doing nothing. You are naive. The mere fact that NetJ.com is a public company apparently makes it potentially desirable to a private company that wants to avoid the hassle involved in going public. Such an approach to business would have been laughable just a few years ago. Still, it is hard to say what distinguishes NetJ.com from most Internet companies. The trick, as one prominent Internet CEO told me, is to keep yourself new. You have to present the stock market with a face-lift every three months. That is the beauty of NetJ.com. As the company explains in an SEC filing, ''The company does not intend to restrict its search [for a partner] to any particular business or industry.'' Of course there are risks here. Some of them are stated pretty clearly in NetJ.com's filings with the SEC. The telling passage is the one that describes, incredibly, the danger of competition. You might think a company that does nothing would have the field to itself. But no! Asthe filing explains,''Management believes that there are literally thousands of 'blank check' companies, many of which have substantially greater financial and management resources.'' Indeed, there are.