Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (90366)	1/29/2000 12:53:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574267

TWY - <It's called a "shill" He pretends to give out some pertinent information their by luring you folks into endless discussion of meaningless dribble. Where's the beef??> So my discussions with you going back to last summer, where you kept prognosticating 800, 866, 933, 1000...in retrospect, you don't find these encounters enlightening? True, I didn't spout off NDA material. However, Intel had demonstrated a 1GHz PIII chilled, and indicated the design "had headroom". Maybe this "shill" functions at least in part to counter FUD and opinion such as yours, albeit, without divulging NDA covered material. You'll need to find other sources for that. In fact, I believe you probably tried this at least once. Just guessing, judging by a very interesting post you once made. BTW, I enjoy your technical contributions to the threads. PB