Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (6428)	1/29/2000 6:29:00 PM
From: Koolaide	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Come on Bill, you couldnt have increased your short position in GUMM. The stock is unborrowable. At least try to be honest! You calling Gumtech a stock fraud is evidence of your lack of DD. I try everyday to borrow the stock at several places and it always the same story......NOPE. Just how much of the 1mm short do you represent?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (6428)	1/29/2000 8:36:00 PM
From: lindend	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

damn DSL connection Just curious, which provider are you using? What type of performance are you seeing? I continue to believe that market risk is unacceptably high to speculate in high-multiple or no-multiple techs Still holding onto COVD or lightening up?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (6428)	1/31/2000 1:38:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Respond to of 10293

COVERING a bit under 10% of my short position in the VLNC stock fraud. Basically covered some stock shorted above 31 a share at 28. Same sort of thing I'm doing with the REFR stock fraud...simply taking some pressure off, increasing the average price of my remaining short position, and waiting to reshort the same shares on any additional pumps.