Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Urlman who wrote (10372)	1/30/2000 8:35:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18366

Well, perhaps that's the clue as to why we saw such a slanted, one-sided and completely unobjective article: PTSC, American and EDIG are all Norris creations. Kupper and his editors didn't paint Woody Norris very well at all, did they? Seems to me that what we saw was a revengeful payback of some kind directed toward Mr. Norris. It was most unfair. And what was even more unfair is the SD Union-Tribune didn't take the company down on the basis of its patented technology, its reengineering and R&D initiatives which are prompting a Nasdaq reemergence, it's business relationships with Intel, IBM, Lucent, Texas Instruments, Lanier and others. No, the Union-Tribune used RagingBull posters, the company's own fans, as a means to deliver the big negative hit against Mr. Norris and his company. In effect, Kupper and editors used the company's own success against it. No question, this was a super lowballing low blow, in my opinion. In no way did the article meet a journalistic standard of 50/50 (positive/negative) reporting. As one whose worked in the media before, I'm disappointed by the quality of what I read. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a future accidentally-spilled drink at one of the Champer of Commerce-sponsored Business After-Hours social events. (LOL)