SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PartyTime who wrote (10373)1/30/2000 8:58:00 PM
From: Urlman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18366
 
SD Tribune Complaint Dept.

Business/Financial News: financial@uniontrib.com

Jeff Rose, News Supervisor jeff.rose@uniontrib.com

Letters to the Editor letters@uniontrib.com



To: PartyTime who wrote (10373)1/30/2000 9:26:00 PM
From: carl a. mehr  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 18366
 
The Union Tribune did a fine job on Elwood Norris. I have met him several times

<<Well, perhaps that's the clue as to why we saw such a slanted, one-sided and completely unobjective article: PTSC, American and EDIG are all Norris creations. Kupper and his editors didn't paint Woody Norris very well at all, did they? >>

They told it like it is. Elwood's investors have never made any money, because his companies PTSC, ATCO, NCII or EDIG have made money. Money made on his stocks has always been made from other investors. The key to success here is to buy low and sell high! MaryInRed's millions will evaporate if she holds on for 2 or 3 years. Has not failed in the past, and when no profits come along hype will not carry the stock. Meanwhile the insiders will start bailing out above 10, while their PR machine grinds on. Watch carefully.

Good luck to all, but three quarters of you will end up holding the bag filled with shares of EDIG...humble eCarl



To: PartyTime who wrote (10373)1/31/2000 6:20:00 PM
From: cAPSLOCK  Respond to of 18366
 
Strange...
I thought the SJ article was level and realistic.
Ugly must also be in the eye of the beholder. ;)

regards,
cAPSLOCK