Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: niceguy767 who wrote (90585)	1/31/2000 9:39:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571686

ng - <By the way Paul, now that you've had days to sit on it...did you come up with whether or not AMD's Y2000 eps will be greater than Intel's Y2000 eps...oh, and also, can you do any better than fudd in explaining the lack of significant growth in Intel's sequential Q4 microprocessor sales in light of AMd's 35% sequential growth?> I haven't done this, and I don't know about Paul, but check out what this guy is saying: Message 12729814 -- reiterated strong buy rating. -- Intel 'is now poised to demonstrate both its technology/manufacturing prowess -- traits that enabled (Intel) stock to double in prior cycles.' -- saw 'substantial upside' for earnings-per-share estimates of $3 for 2000, $3.50 for 2001. Hope this guy is right, and not you. :-0 Nothing personal :-). PB

To: niceguy767 who wrote (90585)	1/31/2000 3:37:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571686

SpryGuy - Re: "oh, and also, can you do any better than fudd in explaining the lack of significant growth in Intel's sequential Q4 microprocessor sales in light of AMd's 35% sequential growth? " It is easy to show a quarter to quarter sequential growth rate when THREE QUARTERS AGO AMD's CPU sales PLUMMETED. Intel's CPU sales have monotonically increased - so they haven't benefitted from a self-inflicted disaster. Can't a SpryBrain like you figure this out without having me to explain it to you? Paul