SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (46165)1/31/2000 10:57:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
You are well aware that pigment WAS found on the shroud, I think. The arguments against it are allegations that it fell from the church, and that it doesn't correspond with the blood, anyway. Some articles from Biblical Archeology Review.

shroud.com

shroud.com



To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (46165)2/1/2000 5:40:00 AM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
Strange, but McCrone who took the tape samples, claims that there are are plenty particles of iron oxide (red ochre) and, where the "blood" is alleged (McCrone denies any blood on the shrowd) he finds mercuric sulphide, vermillion (invented about 600 CE.)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News