Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LBstocks who wrote (6050)	2/1/2000 12:45:00 PM
From: jmac	Respond to of 13582

I'd let the man from WSJ know that he should check with QCOM when it comes to a story about QCOM.

To: LBstocks who wrote (6050)	2/1/2000 1:39:00 PM
From: Kayaker	Respond to of 13582

Response from WSJ> ERICY should check the terms of their settlement agreement. I guess it would be asking too much for the WSJ to check with QCOM. I zapped this to Matt at WSJ earlier this morning. - Yaker -------------------- Hello Matt Your note re W-CDMA, Ericsson, and Motorola was posted on Silicon Investor. I believe that Ericsson and Motorola (along with others such as Nokia) have their own agendas, i.e., they don't like paying royalties to Qualcomm. They like to pretend that W-CDMA is an upgrade to GSM and that minimal royalties will be paid to Qualcomm. Ericsson in particular knows this is BS. Have you asked Qualcomm what their position is? Below are segments I transcribed from Qualcomm conference calls earlier this year regarding their position on their IPR for W-CDMA. I hope you find it helpful. Regards, -------------------------------- Royalty rates for CDMA vs W-CDMA -- Selected Conference Call Segments Below I have transcribed several segments from the March 26, 1999 and April 20, 1999 Qualcomm conference calls.....