SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: w molloy who wrote (6117)2/2/2000 5:38:00 PM
From: DaveMG  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
Okay. They can't or won't say which patents are essential. I can tell you though,
that few Q patents are regarded as 'essential' to the operation of WCDMA. This is the platform.


I bite. I'll give the stupid moron layman's rebuttal. Clarke, yourself, or Walt can provide the technical side.

Even if it were true that "few Q" patents are essential, if they are THE essential patents, well then... Of course patent expiration could still be an issue..

AND...There is no logical explanation for Ericsson's settlement with QCOM other than that they concluded that they could not engineer around QCOM.

Is anyone else claimimng Q's patents aren't essential?



To: w molloy who wrote (6117)2/2/2000 6:07:00 PM
From: quidditch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
w, if Clark were manning the phones at QCOM Investor Relations, the IDC shill might have squeezed an accurate response, assuming Clark had recently reviewed the relevant ITU platforms, the Q patent portfolio and the competing W-CDMA patent portfolio, whatever or wherever that may be.

The IDC shill browbeating a $35,000 p/a assistant to Julie into saying when she stopped beating her wife doesn't tell us anything. Does he really expect a layperson is going to get on the phone with John Q. Public and spout conclusions as to IPR, when it is difficult enough for the patent bar, along with all the telecom and carrier wonks, to get straight what an essential patent is in any given area?

Give me a break!

Steve



To: w molloy who wrote (6117)2/2/2000 9:23:00 PM
From: r.edwards  Respond to of 13582
 
w Molloy, Q's response to W-CDMA Patents;
wcdma>
Message 11837383



To: w molloy who wrote (6117)2/3/2000 12:26:00 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 13582
 
<<IDC club on RB.>> I'm dumb conehead (?) Jon. eom.