Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (74204)	2/5/2000 7:40:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

>>If ya have to know, AZNT has rewritten the thing three times AND , want a certain atty to litigate it. If he takes the case, he'll sign off on it. If not, the origginal atty will sign off.<< Uhhhhhh - right! Translation mostly likely that they don't have the money to pay a lawyer to litigate by the hour, and no one wants to do it on a contingency. My gut feeling is "not to worry," but of course you never know. How did the rough draft surface? Attached to a nasty-gram? ("If you do not cease and desist immmediately my client has authorized me to file the attached and prosecute it vigorously.") It's really, really, rough, BTW, not at all impressive, although of course even a poorly drafted lawsuit is a pain in the tuchas. BTW, even if they do serve you, the Nevada court won't have personal jurisdiction over you, most likely. I can explain that in detail if you don't have a lawyer. I see SI is supposed to be a defendant, as well.