Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ANTs SOFTWARE.COM (ANTS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (212)	2/7/2000 11:34:00 AM
From: Rockwell	Respond to of 607

Man, you're really grasping at straws now. Here's a portion of the January 24th news release. On another front, Pettit made the following statement with respect to certain litigation in which ANTs is currently involved. He said, "In 1992, ANTs Technology licensed certain technology called 'CATS' to a company called Mosaic Multisoft Corporation in return for a 26% interest in Mosaic and rights to cash royalties. The pending litigation commenced by a shareholder and creditor of Mosaic challenges a January 1995 decision by Mosaic's board of directors to terminate the employment of its president. The claim against ANTs Technology is that it improperly influenced the directors. A motion for summary judgment by ANTs Technology and the other defendants is scheduled for hearing on February 4, and a trial is scheduled for March 31. Based on discussions with our attorneys, we believe that the defendants, ANTs being one of same, ultimately will prevail, although there can be no assurances. If we were to lose, the likely consequence would be an award of damages limited by plaintiff's $250,000 lost investment in Mosaic. Ownership of any and all ANTs' technology is not at issue and would not be affected regardless of the outcome. We will release more information as it becomes available." Looks to me that the ANTs's technology is not even an issue. Most at stake is only $250,000.

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (212)	2/7/2000 12:17:00 PM
From: Rockwell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 607

Here's a great buy finance.yahoo.com

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (212)	2/10/2000 7:19:00 AM
From: Crandell Addington	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 607

SmokedAuric: Better get your fill of the Jose Cuervo down at El Molino. "Bubba" says he doesn't allow it; he doesn't like drunk "women". You may be the most ignorant basher I have ever encountered. You're barely coherent, and it appears that you can't read. What about your co-defendant being ordered by the court to retract his statements in your RICO case? Those lies finally catch up with you, don't they? Really looks good for YOU, doesn't it? Down you go, goof. Do you think that anyone will accept your collect calls from what might be your new home? Wow, with all your good advice, I bet you and Tokyo Joe can form the next great investment firm in the jug, if you make it. "Bubba" says he'll help.