Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (66217)	2/7/2000 10:23:00 PM
From: Dennis O'Bell	Respond to of 152472

U know what they say about broken digital clocks...

To: marginmike who wrote (66217)	2/7/2000 10:24:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

mike, i don't even know where to begin addressing your obviously emotional response. i never said that the tbill was better than "equities." do you know how long it took rca to recover its value after the 1929 peak? 30 years, my friend. will you be alive then for 0% return? did that market top outperform bonds for that 30 year period? many equities are good values right now. their future earning potential blows away a 6.5% return over 10 years instead of having a tbill pound its return into the ground by 200%. i own a number of them. as of late, some have become expensive and i am planning on selling a number of them. why? when the big, bloated stocks "correct" (and you better not hope to rational levels as most qcom investors and other investors would be broke), they will shoot everything and ask questions later. what about the guy who bought qcom 50-60 points higher and on marginmike? seems you have colored glasses. there is a latin expression for folks who can't debate and ISSUE so they attack the MESSENGER. do you know what it is? i'll leave you with those math challenged folks who make you feel "good" about your decisions. btw, it isn't like i insulted your girlfriend/wife by saying her looks were overrated. or did i ;-)