Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Whodunit? Two Stockbrokers Murdered in Jersey; No Clues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (965)	2/10/2000 9:32:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1156

It's never been reported, but there was also blood found upstairs. Could this have been dog blood? The way it was told to me it didn't sound like it was bloody paw prints because the speculation was that perhaps the killers may have searched the house to see if anyone else were there and hiding. I was also told the dogs were "wimps" making it hard to imagine they might have bitten the killers. I'd also presume had they bitten the killers they'd have been shot. In fact, I had heard the dogs were hiding upstairs. So, the only explanation I can think that makes sense is the killers heard something moving upstairs, went up to search, saw it was the dogs, and just let them be. Perhaps the dog DNA might be from dog hairs rather than blood or saliva? Perhaps after finding the dogs hiding upstairs the killers petted them? This would mean the blood likely came from one of the killers who was wounded. I suppose there could have been a struggle or a ricocheted bullet or something. Guess we'll find out more details pretty soon if arrests are imminent. - Jeff