SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Global Crossing - GX (formerly GBLX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: quidditch who wrote (4235)2/11/2000 3:25:00 AM
From: Daskin  Respond to of 15615
 
Great post and analysis! I don't think recent GBLX running up is indeed a "breaking out". Strong NAZ is the main factor. GBLX will have her days, but not right now. It is just moving with the entire market. JMHO



To: quidditch who wrote (4235)2/11/2000 9:26:00 AM
From: HW Bowman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15615
 
My 2 cents in response to a wonderful, intelligent, informed and insightful analysis, point by point. 1) I would be surprised if earnings and revenue growth were not surprisingly good. It is not unreasonable that there may have been additional presales in addition to the announced early December $100 MM sale to a Japanese telco whose name escapes me. This is the marketing team that won multiple awards last year, if you recall. Given the acute financial acumen and background of these guys, they will have planned and executed accordingly. When they chose 2/11, I can't say, but they didn't know on 1/12 but did know last week per my inquiries. 2/11 I can see, but why AM and not PM I don't understand. Perhaps they have waited so long (the 1st quarter is more than half over) to be alone in the earnings spotlight. As to option expirations, I don't see how that effects things in terms of being 'lost in the news'; it may be a big deal on the floor, but elsewhere in the news it merits perhaps 5 minutes of one sentence comment. Additionally, with reference to your point #2 that earnings may not metter so much here per se, this is a fourth quarter report, so the report will rightfully review an entire year of absolutely incredible proghress, an avalanche of news, and good news it surely is. These guys have one hell of a story to tell, which is particularly important given the obliviousness of the investing public. Broadband the word is being baNDIED ABOUT, BUT THE IMPLICATIONS AND STAGGERING SIGNIFICANCE ARE JUST BEGINNING TO DAWN ON THE PUBLIC AWARENESS. (excuse caps, I am one fingerat a time.) With respect to your point #3, Hutchison Whampoa was discussed as a quasi red-chip at the time of the HK takeover. These guys have connections to the Red Chinese military and other govt agencies that control Chinese telecom and its development. You want a HK guy for this job, no doubt about it. Your point #4 is an absolutely brilliant observation (ie, 'broadband incubator'), and your analysis of how this might come about is perfectly accurate. Re your point #7: it may be complicated, but this has been the plan all along and these guys can certainly handle it. This is one of the best managewment teams ever assembled as clearly demonstrated by accomplishments to date. The potential implicit here staggers the mind.



To: quidditch who wrote (4235)2/11/2000 10:20:00 AM
From: J Gunn  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 15615
 
Steve, this part of point 7 of your post:
"(remember, GBLX is a foreign company, doesn't have to report 10-Qs with the rest of the joes)."

It is my understanding that GBLX complies with ALL requirements of the SEC that are imposed on U.S. companies.

This was discussed many months ago when concerns about GBLX being a foreign company were raised.

I bet Teddy would know for sure.



To: quidditch who wrote (4235)2/11/2000 12:06:00 PM
From: Robert Sheldon  Respond to of 15615
 
Great notes! Some of my own observations . . .

*I'd be shocked if this were be a big earnings or revenue quarter.*

I agree . . . BUT! remember that GBLX was only supposed to have one OC 192 lit by year end in the northeast. In the last CC they mentioned that they already had the one OC 192 lit and that two more would be brought up by the end of the year. Then a month after that they mentioned they were now running IP over the OC 192s - should be plenty of room for expanded revenues there. Also do not forget that most of the upgrades done to PC1 and North America were completed by early December AND Global Access plus other just completed projects could have been carrying traffic in the month of December. So my point is that we may be in for a reasonably nice quarter.

*. Let's see, how many potential spin-offs: GC, Asia Global Crossing, Hutchison Global Crossing....Is it time yet to call GBLX the "broadband company incubator"?*

Do not forget the VC arm itself - that could be spun off. Perhaps SoftBank would want to take an interest in it . . . :-)



To: quidditch who wrote (4235)2/12/2000 10:47:00 AM
From: HW Bowman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15615
 
Yr point 5: hostile mating of greyhound and elephant unlikely due to extraordinarily high percentage of inside ownership. Winnick controls abt 46% individually and through his Pacific Capital venture. Read somewhere that insiders control 72%, although I don't know if that is current. Therefore institutional investors looking for a short term premium don't hold the necessary cards to dictate outcome. If management sells out, it will be on its terms, and these guys are certainly more aware of the elephant/greyhound situation than anyone. Otherwise, they wouldn't have bet their careers. They will play their cards for maximum benefit, and given the perfect congruence of management and shareholder interest, the little guys are well protected. I would never want to sell this one out, but if management recommended it, I would be hard put not to take a real close look.