Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: w molloy who wrote (3863)	2/12/2000 12:28:00 AM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 5195

Well, isn't that special. Thanks for the heads-up.

To: w molloy who wrote (3863)	2/14/2000 12:16:00 PM
From: D.J.Smyth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5195

molly. why not stick to the real issues at hand that affect IDC's future. let's disscuss IDC's contribution to the 3g platform relative their news release earlier outlining such. you and others prefer to disscuss issues other than IDC's current renewal picture, 3g patents, and system and a chip. you can obviously discuss anything you like, and you and others do it well; but relative to your real need to discuss IDC, the company, it appears your and others' motives for doing so are guided by motivation other than seeking what is true. what is your real purpose for pursuing IDC other than acting as a devil's advocate? is it your understanding that Qualcomm and IDC are mutually exclusive relative to the pursuit of third generation technology (in spite of what is happening with IMT2000)? Or that narrowband CDMA is the best solution for the telecommunications marketplace going forward? Are you intuned to Qualcomm that you have a difficult time reviewing the benefits of IDC's technology plate? What is your real purpose for discussing IDC? To show that you have the ability to tear apart past peripheral aspects of a company without fully addressing actual future prospects in return? You've been consistent in your misuse of terminology regarding the MOT trial, yet this seems to be, to you, an indication that IDC will somehow fail in the future?