Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (74375)	2/12/2000 9:43:00 PM
From: MSB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

From your link: Despite her current success with HRC 2034, Johnson is not relying solely on non-binding resolutions to ensure state sovereignty. She has been joined by a coalition of six other Arizona state representatives, private ranchers and other states' legislators in a lawsuit filed against the federal government. The lawsuit is an attempt to reverse creation of the Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument, which covers more than 1 million acres of land, roughly the same amount as Grand Canyon National Park. The group says national monument status will affect use and access to its private property, which will be surrounded by the federal property I got the impression from the discussion at work, the gist of the issue surrounds the Federal government's desire to add more land to the national park system which suggests a transfer from private hands to public hands. I found the article very interesting especially when one sees a legislative body pursuing issues which have for so long been the subject of table talk. I wonder what would happen if the required number of states dissolved our Federal Government and put a new government in place. Ya think maybe the gold bugs might finally get a pay day?