SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MSB who wrote (74384)2/12/2000 11:36:00 PM
From: nihil  Respond to of 108807
 
The problem is not federal taking of private land, but the President's designation of federal land as national monuments. With a few exceptions, there is no leasing of mineral and grazing rights in land administered by the NPS, while land administered by other federal agencies (USDA) is commonly accessible to other uses. The President used his "emergency powers" under the 1906 Act to designate these areas.
Someone who knows more about the details and federal land law will have to fill in the details.



To: MSB who wrote (74384)2/13/2000 2:37:00 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
If a state really tried to secede, they'd all be shot. If they were somehow allowed to move forward, they wouldn't be able to handle their immigration problem.

Haven't a clue about gold, but apparently it's not the benchmark it used to be.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News