Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (98868)	2/12/2000 9:21:00 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony, re:"Steve, I thought Intel owned the architectures, or at least co-owned them with HP, i.e. Merced, McKinley, etc. Could be wrong." I can find very little information on the McKinley. How much of Willy is McKinley, I don't know. The article only states "the same processor bus" as McKinley. Our Intel employees probably cannot comment without risk. We will see soon enough. HP wouldn't be that dumb, but being an AMDroid, I find it humorous if Intel is pulling a "DEC" against HP. If HP is ok with it, more power to both of them! steve

To: Tony Viola who wrote (98868)	2/13/2000 3:18:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony - Re: "I thought Intel owned the architectures, or at least co-owned them with HP, i.e. Merced, McKinley, etc. Could be wrong" I believe that the Intellectual Property associated with the Intel-HP development efforts are assigned to a THIRD COMPANY (owned by Intel & HP). SO - you can't STEAL what you ALREADY OWN ! That is the IP. The physical design of the MErced/ITanium belongs to Intel - and all the manufacturing rights belong to Intel as well. Paul