Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Smith who wrote (15760)	2/13/2000 11:29:00 PM
From: Steeliejim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 118717

"Game, Set, and Match?" For you maybe. Hey Ump. How about DQ'ing this guy and gettin him outa here. Would you mind taking the in-your-face personal insulting garbage back to Yahoo--or to one of those call-in sports talk radio shows which appears to be a better fit with your attitude and maturity level? I didn't pay good bucks to SI to see this kind of stuff here. Dale didn't agree w/ you re. your pick. Geez, too bad. He doesn't agree with me on all my picks either, but we don't get all in a hissy fit about it. BTW, I see your definition of an "institution" includes any entity, including say, hucksters that can put a couple of nickels together and set up an offshore, reg S stock printing press. Pretty loose definition, I'd say. But if that kind of creativity is what it takes to define your pick as supported by "institutions," go for it. Just don't expect many to buy it. I think it's pretty clear from Dale's posts that he keeps his day job and investing separate--which is why you probably haven't seen a response by him to your outburst yet. Further, it's also pretty clear that he has laid out his trading patterns and record for all to see so there's no creative hindsight, slight of hand. Not many have the guts to do that. Not only because their trading records would not withstand scrutiny, but because they don't want to subjected to the immature, barnyard bully likes of you. Oh yeah, Bosnia. I for one think its pretty cool that anyone would be willing to give up a cushy life style in the good ole US of A to serve ones country in such a place. Apparently, you wouldn't. Ain't the inet great...? It reveals so much of one's character--even for those, such as you, who would be much better off leaving it well hidden. One more time, take it elsewhere.

To: David Smith who wrote (15760)	2/14/2000 12:49:00 AM
From: Steeliejim	Respond to of 118717

Alas, it looks like someone has brought his own personal "cesspool" right here to SI and Dale's fine thread. Would you please take it elsewhere, like to YAHOO or RB, or, better yet, one of those radio sports talk shows, the ones with the in-your-face immature dummies who think they're clever. Well, you're not clever. What you are is throwing a hissy fit, because Dale didn't like your stock. News flash--Dale sometimes doesn't like my picks either, but I don't go stomping around making an a-- of myself like you just did. I suspect Dale hasn't responded yet, because he's at work in a time zone out of synch with ours. And I'm thankful that guys like him are willing to serve in places like Bosnia, because people like you would be willing to let the killing of innocents go on while you sit on your rear and complain. Let's see your trading record. Not after the fact BS. Poor Dale, lays it all out there, and doggone it, it's something most mutual fund managers would gladly trade for. I suspect, deep down, you would too. I hope he doesn't bother responding. Rather, he just gets hold of the SI webmaster who DQ's you and throws you off the court, and out of the stadium. Game, Set and Match. PS to no one in particular--Geez, the net is a wonderful thing--mostly. People seem so ready and willing to reveal their true characters, even when they are foul, nasty and best left well hidden--like Dave Smith's. Now doggone it. Dave has made me mad. Last time I got mad, it was Pluvia. We all know what happened to Pluvia, don't we?

To: David Smith who wrote (15760)	2/14/2000 1:25:00 AM
From: Steeliejim	Respond to of 118717

Unfortunately, my message list stops at 15762, so I didn't see my first message (Flame 1?) and I wrote a second version (Flame 2?). Sorry. Probably 2 too many. Should we have a vote as to which one gets the message across better--or better yet, shall we drop the subject and get back to stock picking? Yeah, I think I like Answer 3. Speaking of INAI, I looked at the insider buying to which DS referred. All shares were at prices less than 2$. Insiders made a good bet. At a current price of 9 something, I wonder how long many of those shares are going to stay captive. INAI looks like it might be viable, but I would think that NT, with its tremendous run recently, if one is interested in it as an investment, there is likely to be a much better entry price, cuz there's an awfully big gap to fill.

To: David Smith who wrote (15760)	2/14/2000 3:57:00 AM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 118717

irishlifeintl.com

To: David Smith who wrote (15760)	2/14/2000 8:09:00 AM
From: TheKelster	Respond to of 118717

David, This kind of posting is not what we are about here. Any courteous, responsible, posting is welcome. We do like to stay as close as possible to the theme of the thread. I do hope you will re-think your approach to the the fine group of folks we have here. Many folks have gravitated to this thread because they are interested in portfolio growth and trading improvement. Holy wars and fight clubs can be found in countless gatherings across the web; we gather for a different cause. Please join us if you find your goals are similar. Although civility is become a lost art, it is a primary characteristic we wish to foster here. KK