SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (93349)2/15/2000 5:24:00 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1571401
 
Re: "If Anand is right I would have expected Intel to at least MENTION the 3GHz # in their press release. Since Intel hasn't said anything about what seems to be a pretty remarkable feat I am not inclined to believe it...yet."

I don't blame you and I'm not confident enough to push the issue.

EP



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (93349)2/15/2000 5:32:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571401
 
Cirrus, some of the Willamette managers had to convince the marketing guys NOT to use the 3.0 GHz number in reporting the frequency. I think if Intel brought too much light to that feature, it would cause a lot of confusion in the marketplace. After all, 1.5 GHz is big enough.

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News