SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kapkan4u who wrote (93429)2/16/2000 12:06:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1579760
 
Kap,

1.5GHz core, 3GHz ALUs numbers seem to be solid.

What are they calling the ALU? A bit shifter? I can guarantee that the control logic for the integer unit is not running at 3 GHz. The latch delays and clock skew would make that impossible.

There are rumors swirling around that it was a specially cooled part built with the experimental 0.13 process.

That is incredibly slimy of them to try to create the impression of an air cooled 0.18u part running at 1.5 Ghz.

Scumbria



To: kapkan4u who wrote (93429)2/16/2000 12:38:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1579760
 
kapkan - <1.5GHz core, 3GHz ALUs numbers seem to be solid. I spoke to one of the Willamette designers about that. There are rumors swirling around that it was a specially cooled part built with the experimental 0.13 process.>

This is absolutely not true. The product was plain vanilla .18 production process. If it was a CD skew wafer or not, I don't know, but that is certainly possible. And as far as I know no special cooling methods employed.

PB



To: kapkan4u who wrote (93429)2/16/2000 1:12:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1579760
 
Kapkan4u,

Great call on the Willamete MHz variation between FPU and Integer. You were ridiculed by Tench, PB and Elmer.

Mani