Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (51828)	2/16/2000 9:08:00 PM
From: LiPolymer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

KP, yup, you, I (and everyone else) get to work with "old" short interest data. Glad you were able to explain that in language you can understand. Now, KP, who's makin' an arse of themselves, eh? When I have a vertical smile it's 'cause my head is tilted to the side. And you? Like I said a few posts ago, let's see how the rest of February plays out. Maybe the smart ones did cover below $8. Sounds like you're probably not numbered amongst those. Gary P.S. VLNC does not need my advocasy, they're doing quite fine based on their own performance and prospects. Considering your allegiance, somewhat blind IMHO, there are no doubts about the "where and why" you are giving credence.

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (51828)	2/26/2000 6:16:00 PM
From: LiPolymer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

KP, I don't know if it's true yet, but someone on SNRS RB just posted the February short interest numbers they allegedly got out of Barrons... -------------------------------------------------- By: fisherking01 Reply To: None Saturday, 26 Feb 2000 at 1:19 PM EST Post # of 44526 ######################################################### $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$NEW SHORT INTEREST NUMBERS.{BARRONS} $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ TEN MILLION FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND!!! #################################### 10,401,358 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ INCREASE OF 9.2%% HUMMM.. -------------------------------------------------- (I'm not sure, but maybe you know this guy?) Here's what you wrote back on February 16th, when I was questioning why so much of the float was still short: Uh, Lithy, you are aware, are you not, that those short interest figures you're seeing on Viwes or Yahoo or wherever, come from a single source which is not only updated only once a month, but in fact is two weeks old when it is published? And you did, did you not, notice that that 9.52M short figure is as of January 10th, five weeks ago, back at the height of the speculative frenzy over SNRS, when, yes, practically every regular on this thread and on the private site held quite a number of shares of SNRS short? (And subsequently made quite a profit off of them.) No, of course you didn't notice these things, because if you did you wouldn't be making an ass of yourself over these meaningless numbers all over these boards. And you wonder why I don't give your advocacy of VLNC much credence. So, if the short interest actually did increase between the ODP and February 10th, what does this forbode? ;-) Next week could get mighty interesting if these short interest numbers, posted today by an acknowledged SNRS short on RB, are actually true. 8-)