Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kayaker who wrote (6720)	2/21/2000 2:56:00 PM
From: Didi	Respond to of 13582

Brilliant, Kay. Thanks much. di eom

To: Kayaker who wrote (6720)	2/21/2000 3:25:00 PM
From: Ruffian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

Seems to me NOK is alone. eom

To: Kayaker who wrote (6720)	2/21/2000 5:03:00 PM
From: JohnG	Respond to of 13582

Kayaker & Phat. Thank you so much for taking the personal time to provide this most helpful transcription. JohnG

To: Kayaker who wrote (6720)	2/22/2000 2:22:00 PM
From: freeus	Respond to of 13582

Thank you so much, wonderful wonderful. Proves that this is definitely a buying opportunity to amass more Qcom or Qcom calls. Freeus

To: Kayaker who wrote (6720)	2/22/2000 3:17:00 PM
From: cfoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

I will add my "thank you" to the others you have received for taking the time to create that transcript. After reading this, in order for one to doubt QCOM's patent position on "W-CDMA" one would have to say that their management is crazy or lying. Since time and events has proven they are smart and trustworthy, the patent question has been put to bed for me. Of course, anyone with enough money can initiate a patent fight with QCOM. However, time to market and the speed with which the wireless market is moving will create a big penalty for companies that take that route. Again, thanks for taking the time to do this.