Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Swanson who wrote (11156)	2/24/2000 10:44:00 AM
From: BuzzVA	Respond to of 18366

I agree Dave. I would like to thank Jon for doing his part in keeping EDIG in a range I've been able to accumulate at. Hey, even cockroaches has a part in the bigger picture...know what I mean Vern. ;~) Some people just choose to go through life with black-colored glasses.

To: Dave Swanson who wrote (11156)	2/24/2000 10:59:00 AM
From: sdr	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18366

Dave IMO you are right - I have followed this guys posts for 2 +++ years - he simply TAKES UP SPACE - he used to give investment advice in various chatrooms until I asked him if he was properly licensed - he never answered but he did disappear for awhile - he also used to have have a web site where he did give advice - don't know if he still has it ??? - I'm sure this will all be denied by jon tara but it is accurate - SDR

To: Dave Swanson who wrote (11156)	2/24/2000 5:46:00 PM
From: cAPSLOCK	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18366

OT -Rant Regardless of JT's denials, I believe he has an agenda, perhaps a grudge against Woody Norris. It seems strange to me that people who offer a difference of opinion on this company are labeled as either being 'shorts' or 'grudgeholders against Woody Norris'. To me, that seems as suspicious as anything someone might accuse a negative view holder of. I suggest his posts be ignored, and it should be obvious that responding to him is a total waste of time. That is heavy handed and manipulative. I suggest YOU allow others to choose for themselves instead of trying to direct their choices for them. If I worked like you I would accuse you of having some sort of agenda, but I am not inclined towards that sort of paranoia. I make the assumption that you are who you represent yourself to be. I realize that there is a good chance that some folks here on either side of the fence are not exactly unbiased, and some might even be operating with ulterior motives. But since I have a BRAIN I don't feel that I should fear these people or even try to figure out who they are. And I will never suggest that others engage in this sort of suspicious thinking. I respect those who say exactly what they think without insinuation. I respect them whether that are for or against an issue. I feel Jon Tara fits this description, having read his recent posts. I am not familiar with previous posting. I have respect for folks like PartyTime who also present what they believe in a reasonable, intelligent manner. Could Jon Tara or PartyTime be paid to take a side on this issue, or have motives for their stance that are not lily white? Sure. But since I am able to think for myself, I don't fear this, and more importantly it is both insulting and wrong. What I DO NOT have respect for are personal attacks, and manipulative suggestions like "Better get in NOW!!" or "If you don't sell you are CRAZY!". I recently made 50% on a stock that I bought 2 weeks ago. The guitar player in my band saw that chart and said: "Maybe I better buy some of that." I told him where to find information about the company, and suggested he do the DD first. Not buy it on my suggestion... Anyway. I for one WELCOME opposing viewpoints on this thread (or any other) as long as they are clear, fair, and presented with a modicum of respect. Just the same way I want to hear the positive stuff. Damn. cAPSLOCK