SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jon Stept who wrote (38509)2/24/2000 9:09:00 PM
From: Captain Jack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
NEW YORK--Stock market investors love Federal Reserve Chairman Alan
Greenspan. During his three terms in office, he's presided over an
unprecedented run of the bull market as well as unparalleled economic
prosperity.

One after the other, he faced off a succession of crises: the 1987
stock market collapse, the mid-1990s inflationary uptick, the Asian flu
and the Russian financial meltdown.

Investors are convinced that with Greenspan at the helm nothing bad
can happen, either to the economy or to the stock market.
Unfortunately, this confidence makes Greenspan's current task much more
difficult to accomplish and could eventually lead to a financial
disaster.

As Greenspan pointed out in his semi-annual congressional testimony,
the main concern of the Federal Reserve at the moment is the
extraordinary shopping spree by American consumers.

Consumption has been the engine of economic growth in recent years,
but during last year's holiday season Americans hit the stops as though
the world really was going to end with the new millennium.

Consumers are now buying much more than the economy can produce,
widening the trade gap by 63 percent last year. Households are also
spending more than they earn. The savings rate has plunged into
negative territory to levels not seen since the Depression.

The cause of this amazing spending boom is the stock market. Over 45
percent of Americans own stocks, either directly or through their
pension and mutual funds. A sustained stock market rally in recent
years has created a fairy-tale world in which nearly everyone can
become rich without making a big effort.

There's no need to put aside anything for old age: your pension fund
holdings have skyrocketed, and projected federal budget surpluses will
create a huge pool of money with which to fix Social Security. You can
spend more than you earn since your existing savings are already
multiplying rapidly in the stock market, at least on paper.

As long as the stock market continues to generate easy money,
consumers will continue to throw it away with gay abandon. The trade
deficit will continue to widen, the dollar will plunge and inflation
will eventually return.

It's Greenspan's responsibility to keep this scenario from unfolding-
which means stopping the bull market. The question is how?

Greenspan is universally considered one of the most powerful men in
the world, but the only tool he has at his disposal is control of
interest rates.

The Fed has already tightened four times since mid-1999, increasing
rates by a full percentage point. Greenspan has told Congress that
rates will be rising as long as the economy continues to grow at an
unsustainable pace.

The stock market is very sensitive to Greenspan's words and deeds.
Stocks tumbled last summer when the Fed started raising rates. This
year, the Dow Jones industrial average is down by over 1,000 points, or
10 percent of its value, which technically constitutes a market
correction.

But investors trust Greenspan. They think he can fix any problem. By
raising interest rates he surely will nip trouble in the bud. So every
period of jitters in recent months has been followed by renewed
efflorescence of optimism, with stocks scaling new heights every time.

Moreover, shares on the NASDAQ Composite have stopped reacting to
higher interest rates altogether. The apologists of the new economy
have convinced investors that high-tech startups use only equity
capital to finance themselves, not bonds or bank loans, and therefore
won't suffer any damage from higher interest rates.

Back in the 1970s, central banks learned that in order to defeat
inflation they must first overcome inflationary psychology. Consumer
snapped up goods because they believed they would be more expensive
tomorrow, workers demanded larger wage increases and businesses raised
their prices to keep up with inflation. As a result, inflation became a
self-fulfilling prophecy.

A similar inflationary psychology now grips stock investors. They buy
stocks because they believe stock prices will keep going up, creating a
novel investment technique called momentum investing--thoughtlessly
buying any stock already on an upward trend.

The only skill you need is not to sell no matter how absurd the
valuations become. Momentum stocks such as Yahoo, Amazon.com and
America Online are sure to keep rising. Stock investors now see every
dip in the market as a buying opportunity, rushing in to buy before the
stocks renew their momentum. Whenever the Fed breaks the upward market
trend, investors rush in and start on another ring of the spiral.

To break the inflationary psychology of the 1970s, Federal Reserve
Chairman Paul Volcker was forced to jack up interest rates to punitive
levels, and keep them up until people were convinced consumer prices
had stopped increasing.

The current Fed chairman may be forced to do the same. For Greenspan
to maintain investor respect, he may have to raise rates higher and
keep them up longer in order to convince investors he wants to put an
end to the bull market.

Greenspan's task is like that of a bullfighter. So far, interest rate
increases have served to get the stock market bull going. To stop the
stock market bubble, Greenspan may be forced to deliver a mortal blow.

ALEXEI BAYER, an economist, is president of Kafan FX Information
Services, a New York-based consulting firm. His views are not
necessarily those of Bridge News, whose ventures include the Internet
site www.bridge.com.



To: Jon Stept who wrote (38509)2/24/2000 9:22:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Jon Stept: If I have a passion it for the truth to be made manifest in this whole disgusting DOJ suit farce. If you would like to familiarize yourself with the case law that stands on the side of MSFT take the time to read the documents at this URL:

microsoft.com

Should a man plead to a lesser included charge when he is not guilty of any wrong doing for the sake of expediency?JFD