Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jill who wrote (5164)	2/25/2000 10:41:00 PM
From: techguerrilla	Respond to of 35685

Hey Jilly Make NO mistake about it! This nubile techmeister is "hanging around" and is "all ears." I just wish I wasn't coming to the party "cacheless" (sans "dry powder"), cyberamiga, Piernas. John (no more "Sybil" jokes, until, of course, I'm a "jillionaire." I looked it up. It's 2 commas, but 7 zeros. OK? Sorry, that was a joke. But at least not tasteless.)

To: Jill who wrote (5164)	2/25/2000 10:48:00 PM
From: Voltaire	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

Salvo number three - The reason people who write calls tend to dislike them is because they buy them back - NEVER, NEVER, NEVER buy back calls unless you roll out or the circumstances are so compelling, it would be foolish to not do it. Example - I bought back my calls on Qcom only after the 4 for 1 was announced but I would not have without that info. I would have simply rolled until they were not called out., It is suicide to do other wise. What about the people who had sold calls and bought them back this morning. Suicide! How about those that didn't, money in the bank and guess what, they sleep well tonight. So, NEVER, NEVER NEVER buy them back. V