SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbe who wrote (75252)2/27/2000 7:54:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
Joan, I had to resort to the old paper Reader's guide at the library, but I finally dug up my favorite dog article from the Atlantic. "Four ways to walk a dog.", by Michael Lenehan, The Atlantic, April 1986 v257 p35(24) . It's not available on the Atlantic web site, unfortunately, though I found it online through Infotrac, a db we get through the library system here. It's really way too long to post, but it's both funny and informative. Pretty touching too. 2 of the 4 ways are old line animal trainer William Koehler and new wave doggie behaviorist Michael Tortora. (aside: sometimes deconstructionist literary critic, Yale faculty member, animal trainer and Pit Bull devotee Vicki Hearne is a Koehler disciple, but that's another story).

The bit I remembered best:

That individual dogs of the same breed--even of the same litter--Can have vastly different "personalities" is no great secret. Any experienced dog person, and countless popular books, will tell you as much; certainly a great many have tried to tell me. But the lesson and its importance did not sink in for me until I visited the Seeing Eye. It's in the air there. Every day Pete Jackson works with eight or ten different dogs--a bold one, a lazy one, a sensitive one, a nervous one, a shy one. Every fourth Saturday a new group of blind people arrives on the campus--bold ones, lazy ones, and every other type--and on Sunday each goes on a "Juno walk" with one of the trainers. The trainer, holding one end of a working harness, plays the role of Juno, a trained guide dog, and leads the person through the streets of Morristown. After this opportunity to judge their students' physical strength, walking pace, and personality, the trainers huddle with their supervisors and decide which dog is best suited to which person. Making the right matches, they say, is one of the most important elements of the program.

I began to appreciate this when I met my own match, a German shepherd I'll call Solly. Pete Jackson had prepared me to dislike this dog. He told me that Solly was timid, that he jumped at loud noises; for his first three weeks of training he had literally refused to come out from between Jackson's legs. I was attracted to the dog from the moment I saw him. Unlike most of the Seeing Eye dogs I'd encountered, Solly walked at a pace that seemed sensible to me. He did not respond to precious talk or phony enthusiasm. He did not require elaborate displays of affection, nor did he give any. He did his work deliberately, intelligently, and (by the time I saw him) never made a mistake. I wanted to tell Jackson: This dog is not slow, he's careful. This dog is not afraid, he's reserved. This dog is not skittish--I don't like loud noises either! When I did confess my admiration for the dog, Jackson was not a bit surprised. "Sure. He's your kind of dog," he told me. Jackson had known me less than two days at this point. He proceeded to deliver a brief analysis of my personality, enumerating a few traits that I thought only my wife understood fully.

When Solly and Pete Jackson taught me that dogs really do have personalities, I felt that I was beginning to understand dog training. All the conflicting claims of the trainers I had met, the hostile ideologies, the various methods that seemed to have nothing in common except that they all worked--now they fell into place behind words that Jackson had said to me on our first day together: "Every dog has to be treated differently." If this is true, perhaps it follows that every method of training will work on some dogs, and no method will work on all of them. Dogs are resilient; most of them will do fine no matter what they are subjected to. But why shouldn't some thrive on gentle patience while others thrive on discipline? Military school is not for everyone. Neither is Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood.


Cheers, Dan.