Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Grabczyk who wrote (10354)	2/27/2000 10:56:00 AM
From: Steve Grabczyk	Respond to of 18928

An example of one of those 'brain disorders' I mentioned in an earlier post. Note to myself: The resistance setting is causing the buys to be above the highs for the day. Or does resistance stay constant, and min $ follows the volatility? Yes! I think min $ follows the volatility. This will maximize the action and compensate for classic AIM's direction to execute your order$ @ the market. The question is whether to hold at that level if no orders execute, or to adjust to new (possibly lower) volatility % if no orders execute for a while. In other words, as the volatility slows down, then you ought to be able to maintain some degree of order execution by lowering the min $ to some floor level. until such time as the volatility is so low that a certain $ amount or % of PC won't execute an order. Then you may need to liquidate entirely, and move on. My brain hurts......

To: Steve Grabczyk who wrote (10354)	2/27/2000 8:21:00 PM
From: OldAIMGuy	Respond to of 18928

Hi Steve, I first bought NERX in late 1992 and also own their Preferred stock NERXP. It's taken a very long time and lots of AIM trades to make this a profitable holding for me. The recent burst of capitalization increase has taken this account to new all time high values for me. I'd have to check, but if memory serves me correctly, split adjusted I started my NERX account at about $12/share. Since NERX was about the only holding in which I had some "expensive" shares, I sold about half the position to take tax loss last year. The remaining shares had a cost base of $1.50. So this recent run has been very nice. The Preferred is also getting a bit of improved price/share in recent times. "What a long, strange trip it's been!" Best regards, Tom