Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: themadsnooker who wrote (12791)	2/27/2000 4:25:00 PM
From: themadsnooker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The next target will be Shrub's putting to death of an abused woman. Now, we all know this woman didn't kill TWO of her husbands by accident. Still, it is the kind of thing that hurts a party in a general election. So the Stupid Party can continue to back Shrub ("The Snowman") and give Gore ammunition in the election, or it can come to its senses and back McCain. We ALL know that ALL women will sympathize with the husband killing woman from Texas. If there was any justice in the world, ALL of us men would, at the very least, have been hit with a hubcap a la Tonya Harding (except for the "men with no penis" who support the Christian Coalition, only to be discovered with an underaged prostitute shortly thereafter).

To: themadsnooker who wrote (12791)	2/27/2000 4:44:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

And the contrasting argument would go something like this. If it's the right of the mother to kill a fetus because it really isn't life. Is it also the right of the mother to perform experimental surgery on the fetus. Like removing the brain, an arm or leg, just for scientific discoveries? After all, what is worse, death or disfigurement? These are the questions very few pro-abortion people will answer also. Michael