SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lorne who wrote (25530)2/28/2000 12:34:00 PM
From: teevee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Lorne,

The only problem is that they were right and now the dogs from the native camps won't even eat the pike from the river.

Natives prefer not to eat pike and will only feed pike to their dogs when there is nothing else. There is little nutritional value in them. For energy, you need a fish with oil in it like white fish or char.

cheers,
teevee



To: Lorne who wrote (25530)2/28/2000 2:51:00 PM
From: Bob Fairchild  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
I'm not convinced that the Diavik mine will be anymore damaging to the environment than the four wheelers, boats and skidoos motoring around up there. If I felt otherwise, I would not invest in this company.
If the mine was located on the river as opposed to the lake the effects of the current would be a factor worth considering, but it is negligible in my opinion. We are talking about a relatively small development in one corner of a very large lake (which, correct me if I am wrong is not the true source of the Coppermine River).
Comparing a diamond mine to a pulp and paper factory is a stretch, as well as the occasional references to gold mining disasters.
My point was that overfishing by overzealous "sports fishermen" puts it's own form of pressure on the environment that should not be discounted.

Bob



To: Lorne who wrote (25530)2/28/2000 2:56:00 PM
From: .Trev  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Lorne:

Plwse check out this link to see why I will be very happy if no one goes anywhere near Jellystone with anything bigger than a toothpick.

Message 12924567

TeeVee you might have some thoughts on this deep subject also. What's under jellystone definitely doesn't sound as if it's diamondiferous.

Cheers

EDIT On second thoughts it might be a direct link to Argyle via the direct route???????