Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (95716)	2/28/2000 7:37:00 PM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571996

Paul: Re: "Comment (2) - Independent Benchmarkers have Verified that Intel's Coppermine is FASTER than an equivalently clocked AMD AthWiper in 8 out of 13 benchmarks !!!" Comment: I'll ask again...Did they test all 6 of the wannabee PWeeiii 800's that have been successfully produced since October '99 when the flood was promised?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (95716)	2/28/2000 7:44:00 PM
From: Gopher Broke	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571996

Paul, <Coppermine is FASTER than an equivalently clocked AMD AthWiper in 8 out of 13 benchmarks> Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think Intel ship processors that can clock as high at the Athlon 850 do they?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (95716)	2/28/2000 8:53:00 PM
From: crazyoldman	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1571996

Hello Paul "Athwipe" Engle, Re: Comment (2) - Independent Benchmarkers have Verified that Intel's Coppermine is FASTER than an equivalently clocked AMD AthWiper in 8 out of 13 benchmarks !!! anandtech.com A short while back you were discrediting Anand and his benchmarks, as I recall you were labeling Anand as "...some pimply faced high school kid...". Now you are using Anand's benchmarks to validate your point??? I'm confused here. Are Anand's benchmarks creditable or not??? Clarify please.