Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gnuman who wrote (76721)	2/29/2000 10:01:00 AM
From: Steve Lee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Gene, I had read that journalistisc opinion on RMBS. Here is an opinion from those in the business that was released this morning: Rambus Inc. Announces Five RDRAM Suppliers in Volume Production Hyundai and Infineon Pass Validation Tests, Joining Samsung, Toshiba and NEC in Volume Production biz.yahoo.com Micron next. Hitachi will probably not be allowed to join in. With the drop in DRAM, they will all want to be producing the RAM that is in demand and is bringing in the profits - RDRAM.

To: gnuman who wrote (76721)	2/29/2000 10:48:00 AM
From: BSGrinder	Respond to of 132070

Good spot. Did you see this comment that was attached to the article: Name: David Lam Location: New York Occupation: Network Engineer 50% price difference my eye. pricewatch.com 64MB RDRAM Module : $309 64MB PC133 SDRAM : $30 And thats the cheapest RDRAM too, god forbid if you try to compare to an 800MHz ECC module. RDRAM is screwed. It's stuck to a niche player. Only thing thats gonna use RDRAM is Console machines like the PlayStation 2 and N64. Of course there is Dell, but they'll use it cause they have they're brownosing a certain corporate giant who's futile effort to try to fully control the market and maintain a monopoly has backfired... COUGH COUGH INTEL. ; )