SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: xun who wrote (96110)3/1/2000 5:13:00 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1571102
 
Look at ATML, a pure flash play. It has $11b market cap with less revenue than AMD's flash revenue. That tells me how the street discounts AMD's processor business. I remember the BOA analyst saying AMD is trading at less than 15 P/E. I just hold AMD tight waiting for a fair valuation.

panic_mob,

In all fairness the only way AMD can have a P/E at all is to project earnings forward. For the past two years AMD has been losing $ (until last quarter) and a P/E calculation was not possible.

In time as AMD has a couple of more profitable quarters, I think it will begin to share the same P/E valuations placed on other semi's.

ted



To: xun who wrote (96110)3/1/2000 6:24:00 PM
From: xun  Respond to of 1571102
 
Short Squeezes and Backfired Bets


By James J. Cramer

3/1/00 7:48 AM ET

Now that Herb's cried
uncle, it is important to
recognize that many of
these outsized moves are
outgrowths of some of
the most amazing short squeezes in history.

I want to focus on four particular squeezes, where bets
against stocks backfired in a big, big way. Remember,
when you short stock, you have to buy it back at some
point -- unless it gets delisted. In these four cases, the
stocks "got away" from the shorts. They just kept
climbing and climbing and climbing, causing a house
of woe to be visited upon those who sold shares short.

The first is Rambus (RMBS:Nasdaq), which was
effectively chronicled here -- if not predicted -- by
Marcy Burstiner in our fine tech coverage. People
thought Rambus would be designed out; they are in
big-time. Now the stock is grotesquely overvalued as
the shorts try to reel the stock back, but the longs
won't let them.

Second is Oracle (ORCL:Nasdaq). People were worried
that Oracle was having a soft quarter. Shorts pushed
and pushed against this one, betting on some sort of
negative preannouncement. Instead the company
delivered on a colossal win in the B2B space. Shorts
were -- and are -- being annihilated.

Third on the short hit parade is 3Com
(COMS:Nasdaq). The smart money was betting that
3Com was going to have a crummy quarter, hit by
Cisco's (CSCO:Nasdaq) aggressiveness in the space.
But the Palm spinoff wrecked those nightmares. The
losses for the shorts here are just huge.

Finally, how do you spell pain if you are short? Take a
look at LHSP (LHSP:Nasdaq). Just check out the chart.
I don't need to say any more. This was a massive
squeeze and it is taking people apart. Daily.

I will go over this piece Saturday in depth so people
understand the squeeze concept, but this is why these
stocks took off. No doubt about it.



To: xun who wrote (96110)3/1/2000 7:38:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571102
 
panicmob, > I remember the BOA analyst saying AMD is trading at less than 15 P/E.
I just hold AMD tight waiting for a fair valuation.


But will it come? Could it be AMD is looked upon as a one trick pony whose main competitor can rough you up pretty good?

Tony