Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Benes who wrote (49975)	3/3/2000 9:25:00 AM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116766

The market has already discounted the known new supply coming from gold miners. And, another thought - if gold is a currency - why should it go UP or DOWN - other than is normal for currencies in general? So maybe we all have to get used to gold being in a trading range around these levels say $275 - $330 - and let the fittest survive? And I think Barrick has recognised this for many years - its growth will come through expansion in the reality of the gold market as it actually exists - not as some would have it or dream it to be. Benes keeps carping about supply - yet one never hears him referring to increases in the Money Supply - however measured - and if gold is money .............?