Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (96587)	3/3/2000 2:59:00 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572033

Paul, Did you buy NSM like I told you to do yesterday? Scumbria

To: Paul Engel who wrote (96587)	3/3/2000 3:33:00 PM
From: Rob Young	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572033

Paul, "At 733 MHz, ITanium will have no difficulty in outperforming the UltarSparc II or III - the only competition it needs to worry about." Development platform... Compaq , Sun , etc. etc.. Development platform: news.cnet.com "When we signed the porting agreement with Intel (to bring Solaris to Itanium), we initiated a very aggressive program for getting (software companies) to port and support Solaris on Merced. The slips in the Merced schedule have made it very difficult for us to get a strong foothold there," MacRunnels said. "There's a lot of wait-and-see when it comes to supporting Merced as anything more than a development platform." ---- Sun really can't do much with it... the delays killed any idea of throwing their weight behind it. Besides, Sun has the 100 processor follow-on to the VERY successful UE10000 waiting in the wings. Sure ain't running an Itanium processor. Why should they? No one can answer that question. Help us out. Rob