SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: REW who wrote (39932)3/3/2000 6:23:00 PM
From: Susie924  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
He would like the stock to be $1.50 - $2 by the shareholder meeting
Wouldn't we all!
The reverse was required by the funding institution
So it's official then? Why didn't they just spell it out in the PR? It would have kept people from dreaming about other possibilities of reducing the share count.
Shareholders of TSIG.com should not and never should contact a TSIG.com client.
Although I agree with that maybe the company should stop releasing PR's that are vague at best.
The terms are very favorable and will please everyone.
The institution identification will also intensly brighten your day.

How do you know that Bob? Did he tell you what the terms were or who the financial institution is?



To: REW who wrote (39932)3/3/2000 6:34:00 PM
From: V$gas.Com  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 44908
 
And, what pray tell, do you expect the reverse to be? Is the $1.50 to $2.00 range by the shareholders meeting to be inclusive of the split? Is this another one of your BS ploys, as you pulled last May, announcing that Marty Frankel was on the board 7 hours prior to the BOD meeting only to find out later that you sold into your own BS statements and that Marty had turned down the appointment? Sorry Bob, but your credibility sucks. I hope the SEC nails your ass.



To: REW who wrote (39932)3/3/2000 8:30:00 PM
From: Rich  Respond to of 44908
 
Bob
Thanks for your post with RG.

Shareholders of TSIG.com should not and never should contact a TSIG.com client.
I agree with that maybe the company should put some meat in PR's that says it all.That way shareholders won't call the client.
Thanks again for the report.

Rich



To: REW who wrote (39932)3/3/2000 9:53:00 PM
From: JRSwails  Respond to of 44908
 
Bob...Great post...Thanks for taking the time and informing the board. I sincerely hope that what you reported was not blown out of proportion and in no way violates SEC rules. We love the info, but we sure don't want to blow this deal.
Thanks again,
Jerry



To: REW who wrote (39932)3/4/2000 11:12:00 AM
From: Suzanne Newsome  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 44908
 
Bob, I read your report of your meeting with Gordon and the responses you received on SI and RB. Thanks for raising the DD-Index on this thread by about 1000%. Some people objected to your report. After all, no good deed goes unpunished. I noted that you never responded to the morons. It's interesting to see that people feel like they can tell you to tell Gordon what to say. I shake my head in disbelief. If you ever choose to distribute your reports privately, I will understand. You are truly an "officer and a gentleman." Regards, Suzanne



To: REW who wrote (39932)12/17/2000 1:26:46 PM
From: V$gas.Com  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
A Little Trip down Memory Lane. How much of this has come true? I wonder if REW made most of this up? Is this the kind of company you want to invest in? What BS!!!!!

Suzanne Newsome who wrote (39925)
From: REW
Friday, Mar 3, 2000 6:07 PM ET
Reply # of 43789

***MEETING with CEO GORDON - 3-3-00***

I met with Robert Gordon today for almost an hour. The outlook and view of TSIG.com appears to be one of
tremendous potential and promise. This has been shown through the alliances and sponsors already announced.
Further proof will be coming shortly and with vigor.

The response of the Coke SuperBowl event was beyond expectations. There are 12 Coke distributors within the
US and all have called TSIG.com to inquire about further sponsorships. Coke was so pleased the next deals
should be no problem and discussions are going on. I would suspect it won't be long before we see the next one.

The favorable response of the Coke SuperBowl event continued with approx 30 calls from other non-Coke entities
inquiring about doing business also.

He admitted the Lifetime contract was not handled right last time. Steps have and are being made to have it be the
producer next time that we expected. Some sort of internet connection is being set up along with additional
attention. The mailing will also be a lot cheaper since the initial costs are out of the way.

UCP meetings and negotiations are continuing. The UCP sponsors are negotiating and coming to terms. Sounds
like some are close.

There are a lot of contracts at the ready. 2 PRs/week could be light in the short run. Many will be material deals.
He would like the stock to be $1.50 - $2 by the shareholder meeting and feels very undervalued right now.

New products and combinations are very close to fruition.

They are in the process of or close to hiring about a dozen employees to manage what will be coming.

The possible revenue to TSIG.com with what is on the table and possible to close amounts to approx $1 Billion.
That is the best I could do without getting names of deals.

Shareholders of TSIG.com should not and never should contact a TSIG.com client. Coke received calls and got
perturbed. This is not at all good. This action was one of the high points in losing the Signature deal last year. At
least they can still talk.

The reverse was required by the funding institution. Everyone will know what it is soon. Approval turns loose the
$40m line.

The terms of the funding arrangement will not be disclosed until the registration. That happens about 2 weeks after
the shareholder meeting. They are playing everything according to the SEC.

The terms are very favorable and will please everyone.

The institution identification will also intensly brighten your day.

Approval of the share restructuring is not a decision in Gordon's opinion. If you want the company to go forward
and accomplish all that is on the table (past, present, and future), it must be approved. The $40m draw capability
opens the doors for a multitude of progressive actions.

The doors will be open to expand the product line, make acquisitions, create new fronts within the focus of the
company, and generate continued and new relationships that are substantial and rewarding.

This will be a real internet company with institutional buying and Wall Street support. Trading over $5 will bring and
allow brokers to recommend and buy.

He feels, as I do, that Nasdaq in or by Sept is in the picture with the approval. I assume most know what happens
then.

Non-approval takes them back to ground zero and would likely lose large anticipated accounts. Welcome to
OTCBB land and the MMs.

The meeting went very well within the confines set and I felt very pleased with the results. My feel is we have a very
big company coming on line and I will remain to see it accomplish the mission set forth.

The above is my best recollection of the meeting. Everyone should do their diligence within their capabilities. Make
your decisions according to your financial tolerances.

Bob



To: REW who wrote (39932)12/17/2000 1:32:01 PM
From: V$gas.Com  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
NASDAQ by September? What a joke!! Just more lies! You even agreed with this REW!! Hey, look what the reverse split has done for you shareholders thus far. Back to a nickle pre-split. Great investment here.

""He feels, as I do, that Nasdaq in or by Sept is in the picture with the approval. I assume most know what happens
then.""